The quotation in question is the following.
"Truly, truly, I say to you, he who believes in me will also do the works that I do; and greater works than these will he do, because I go to the Father." (John 14:12)
Last night, when Deacon Tsang did his homily, he did not question Jesus' words. He simply expressed the pressure he felt this verse had put on him as a deacon. This morning, Fr. Joseph Liu, a young priest, did not touch on the verse but went to discuss how only the Father could satisfy all our needs. But when I meditate about the verse, my brainy me quickly takes over and a lot of questions start to pop up.
Jesus once said that a servant is not greater than his master (15:20). Though this verse appears later than the one in question, there should not be any contradiction between them. Though Jesus treats us like friends (15:14-15), we are commissioned by Jesus to proclaim the gospel (Matthew 28:19). In this sense, we are servants. If we are not greater than Jesus, our master, how can we do greater works than Jesus? Moreover, Jesus is God and works miracles and we do not possess Jesus' power. How can we do greater works than Jesus' works? Furthermore, how does Jesus' going to the Father enable us to do greater works than his?
This is a good example of the difficulties one meets when he reads the gospel of John. When Jesus speaks, he speaks equivocally. When the disciples asked some concrete earthly questions, Jesus almost always brought out the spiritual dimensions in his answers. For example, when he said he was going to his Father's house to prepare rooms for the disciples, we cannot blame Thomas for understanding it in a rather physical way. That is Jesus was going to a physical location, to a house of concrete stones to prepare rooms, perhaps 12, for them. Today, even if we understand Jesus to mean his upcoming passion, resurrection and ascension, and that we would like Jesus to show us the means, the way, to be our guide to heaven, his answer "I am the way, and the truth and the life" (14:6) seems not to be the kind of answer we expect. We expect a road-map, a game-plan or whatever but not "I am something ...". Jesus did not seem to have answered our question. But in a profound way, he did answer our question. In order to go to heaven, to return to the Father, we need to establish and maintain a good relation with Jesus. We need to know him. This, I think is what Jesus meant when he said "I am the way".
Now, what about our doing greater works than Jesus's work?
What works has Jesus done on earth?
First of all, Jesus confined his mission to Israel. For example, when a Canaan woman begged Jesus to drive out the demon in her daughter, Jesus replied that he was only sent to the lost sheep of the house of Israel (Matthew 15:24). Now, the gospel is spread throughout the world, as instructed by him. In a sense, we have done greater works than Jesus's works.
Secondly, Jesus cured diseases, leprosy, blindness and even exorcism. Nowadays, we do the same and better still, we nearly eliminate most of the diseases in ancient times. Of course, our life expectancy is longer and we have newer medical challenges to deal with. Moreover, our attitude towards illness has changed. Instead of seeing it as a punishment from God, we are more compassionate, like Jesus, towards the sick. Thanks to the teaching of Jesus which was rather revolutionary at his time. Today, we are more Christianized and civilized. We respect human rights and we do charities in greater scale.
Thirdly, Jesus preaches a kingdom of God which is to be established through self-renunciation, through putting God at the centre of our life. Nowadays, many ideologies have sprung up from Jesus' inspiration to build a utopia on earth. Though they could only establish a totalitarian regime instead, we cannot deny that they have done greater works than Jesus in scale. These failed experiments indicate that it is not easy to remove the aspirations to power and might over his fellow men from the heart of man.
Of course, there are still works which we have not yet excelled him. For example, Jesus fed 5000 with 5 loaves and 2 fish. Today, we are still unable to eradicate world hunger. Poverty and slavery in the form of human-trafficking and prostitution are still around. Fortunately, we still have time to work humbly on the solution. This is not yet the end.
Dear Lord, I thank You for empowering us to do greater works than what you have begun. Help us along the way to build up a better relationship with You and the Kingdom of Heaven. Amen.
Translate
Showing posts with label john matthew. Show all posts
Showing posts with label john matthew. Show all posts
Sunday, 18 May 2014
Sunday, 4 March 2012
Christain Freedom
Imagine you were Donald Tsang, the Chief Executive of the Hong Kong SAR. These days, he was subjected to unprecedented pressure from the public for receiving advantages from tycoon friends. In a Legislative Council meeting, he was drilled mercilessly for more than an hour. He offered an apology for damaging the image of the public servants of Hong Kong, but stopped short of admitting his faults. As a Catholic and having the good habit of going to Church every morning before returning to his office, Donald must feel very much consoled this morning in hearing the reading from the Epistle to the Romans. Let me quote the reading in length.
What then shall we say to this? If God is for us, who is against us?
He who did not spare his own Son but gave him up for us all, will he not also give us all things with him?
Who shall bring any charge against God's elect? It is God who justifies;
who is to condemn? Is it Christ Jesus, who died, yes, who was raised from the dead, who is at the right hand of God, who indeed intercedes for us? (Romans 8:31-34)
Catholics and Christians believe that God has put a conscience in our soul, a small voice within us to tell us the right from wrong and passes judgment on our wrong doings. So, can a Catholic or a Christian appeal to his own conscience to justify his behaviours? Can he ignore public decrial?
Though trained a Pharisee, St. Paul is responsible for playing down the importance of keeping the rituals (Laws) in order to attain justification. The spirit is more important and flexible than the letters, especially because man has a tendency to play safe and interpret the letters of the Law literally. In short, St. Paul advocates Christians' freedom from the Law, because the Spirit is like the wind and blows where it wills. The Holy Spirit is a guarantee of Christian salvation. God puts the Holy Spirit into the hearts of Christians as a down payment for their salvation. Therefore, Christians are men of the Spirit and free from the Law. They only need to listen to the advice from their conscience and act accordingly. God is their judge. You and me are unable to judge whether a Catholic has or has not followed his conscience. Only God knows.
Has Donald been greedy? Is it wrong for him to receive advantages from tycoon friends? I cannot judge because those are his friends. We need an ICAC to collect evidence to prove that those friends have received favouritism in their businesses as a result of their amiable connection with Donald. I can only say that it is imprudent of Donald to receive hospitality in his present position no matter how free he is in Christ. His freedom is not absolute and he must pay a price when he is not prudent enough. If his subordinates are imprisoned for receiving advantages but he is not, then it violates the principle of justice. People demand greater integrity from the man occupying the top job.
Let's return to read more carefully Paul's passage.
If God is for us, who is against us? (Romans 8:31b)
How do you know that God is for you? Simply by being a Catholic or Christian?
Let us read on.
Who shall bring any charge against God's elect? (Romans 8:33a)
Are you sure you are God's elect? How do you know you are God's elect? What does it mean to be God's elect? Simply by being baptized as a Catholic or Christian?
I don't think I can provide you with an answer. Search for yourself what "God's elect" means in the Epistle to the Romans. All I can say is that the passage must be read in context.
Even when we read the text out of context, we should remember what God has done for us all.
He who did not spare his own Son but gave him up for us all (Romans 8:32a).
We should remember how much God has loved us. Remember what Jesus said in the gospel of John. He is in the Father and the Father is in him (John 17:21). He and his Father are one (John 10:30, 17:11, 22). Therefore, when God did not spare his own Son but gave him up for us all, God Himself was unimaginably involved in this sacrifice. This sacrifice is for all, not just for the elected. So, what about the elected?
The elected are those who have listened to the gospel, repented, made God the core of their life and lead their life accordingly: "Poor in spirit ... mourn ... meek ... hunger for justice ... merciful ... pure in heart ... peace makers ... persecuted ..." (Matthew 5:3-10).
According to the text of the Romans, God will not condemn the elected. Rather, He would justify them, make them blameless. Christ will intercede for them when they suffer. Therefore, if Donald has a clear conscience. Be patient. Keep your hope in Christ. He will pray for you and the Father will justify you.
Dear Lord, I know my transgressions, and my sin is ever before me. May Your mercy uplift me on my feet and proceed ahead. Amen.
What then shall we say to this? If God is for us, who is against us?
He who did not spare his own Son but gave him up for us all, will he not also give us all things with him?
Who shall bring any charge against God's elect? It is God who justifies;
who is to condemn? Is it Christ Jesus, who died, yes, who was raised from the dead, who is at the right hand of God, who indeed intercedes for us? (Romans 8:31-34)
Catholics and Christians believe that God has put a conscience in our soul, a small voice within us to tell us the right from wrong and passes judgment on our wrong doings. So, can a Catholic or a Christian appeal to his own conscience to justify his behaviours? Can he ignore public decrial?
Though trained a Pharisee, St. Paul is responsible for playing down the importance of keeping the rituals (Laws) in order to attain justification. The spirit is more important and flexible than the letters, especially because man has a tendency to play safe and interpret the letters of the Law literally. In short, St. Paul advocates Christians' freedom from the Law, because the Spirit is like the wind and blows where it wills. The Holy Spirit is a guarantee of Christian salvation. God puts the Holy Spirit into the hearts of Christians as a down payment for their salvation. Therefore, Christians are men of the Spirit and free from the Law. They only need to listen to the advice from their conscience and act accordingly. God is their judge. You and me are unable to judge whether a Catholic has or has not followed his conscience. Only God knows.
Has Donald been greedy? Is it wrong for him to receive advantages from tycoon friends? I cannot judge because those are his friends. We need an ICAC to collect evidence to prove that those friends have received favouritism in their businesses as a result of their amiable connection with Donald. I can only say that it is imprudent of Donald to receive hospitality in his present position no matter how free he is in Christ. His freedom is not absolute and he must pay a price when he is not prudent enough. If his subordinates are imprisoned for receiving advantages but he is not, then it violates the principle of justice. People demand greater integrity from the man occupying the top job.
Let's return to read more carefully Paul's passage.
If God is for us, who is against us? (Romans 8:31b)
How do you know that God is for you? Simply by being a Catholic or Christian?
Let us read on.
Who shall bring any charge against God's elect? (Romans 8:33a)
Are you sure you are God's elect? How do you know you are God's elect? What does it mean to be God's elect? Simply by being baptized as a Catholic or Christian?
I don't think I can provide you with an answer. Search for yourself what "God's elect" means in the Epistle to the Romans. All I can say is that the passage must be read in context.
Even when we read the text out of context, we should remember what God has done for us all.
He who did not spare his own Son but gave him up for us all (Romans 8:32a).
We should remember how much God has loved us. Remember what Jesus said in the gospel of John. He is in the Father and the Father is in him (John 17:21). He and his Father are one (John 10:30, 17:11, 22). Therefore, when God did not spare his own Son but gave him up for us all, God Himself was unimaginably involved in this sacrifice. This sacrifice is for all, not just for the elected. So, what about the elected?
The elected are those who have listened to the gospel, repented, made God the core of their life and lead their life accordingly: "Poor in spirit ... mourn ... meek ... hunger for justice ... merciful ... pure in heart ... peace makers ... persecuted ..." (Matthew 5:3-10).
According to the text of the Romans, God will not condemn the elected. Rather, He would justify them, make them blameless. Christ will intercede for them when they suffer. Therefore, if Donald has a clear conscience. Be patient. Keep your hope in Christ. He will pray for you and the Father will justify you.
Dear Lord, I know my transgressions, and my sin is ever before me. May Your mercy uplift me on my feet and proceed ahead. Amen.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)