將臨期第三主日（乙年）
太陽之下無新事（訓1:9），二千年前發生的故事，今天仍繼續演出。
耶穌時代可以說是一個亂世。猶大淪為羅馬帝國的殖民地，有人攀附權貴，甘心做羅馬人的傀儡，跑腿，做統治者的宣傳機器，亦有人選擇使用暴力頑抗，而大部份人就忍氣吞聲做沉默的大多數。就在整個社會都充滿壓力的時候，忽然在曠野出現了一個「你們悔改罷，因為天國臨近了」的呼聲（瑪3:2）。京城的權力中心自然要派人去查個究竟。這個調查團包括了司祭、肋未人和法利塞人。當他們問若翰的身份時，若翰一口否定了自己是他們所期待的默西亞。那麼，默西亞究竟是甚麼呢？
「默西亞」是希伯來文受傅者的意思。在舊約時代，那些身負重要公職的人，例如君王和司祭，都會經過一個公開的儀式，把香油倒在候選人的頭上，向以色列人民表示他們是天主所揀選的人。這個「默西亞」的稱號，不一定是以色列人專用的，例如，依撒意亞先知曾預言波斯王居魯士是上主的受傅者（依45:1）。
達味統一十二支派成為以色列國的君王的初期，安放了十誡的約櫃仍然在帳幕內（撒下7:2）。於是達味想為天主建造一座聖殿，供奉天主的約櫃。天主見達味一片忠心，不但不要達味為祂建造聖殿，反而藉納堂先知之口，應許達味的王朝永遠長存。這就是有名的「納堂神諭」。下一個主日的讀經一就是這一段。
後來達味的王朝覆滅，猶大國人充軍巴比倫，要由波斯王居魯士這個默西亞解放他們回國。痛定思痛，天主的諾言是絕不會落空的，所以縱使達味王朝一時滅亡，天主總會派遣一個達味的後裔來重建達味王朝。這個就是天主所派遣，所傅了油的「默西亞」。
當調查團查問若翰時，大部份的猶太人正熱切期望默西亞來驅逐羅馬人，解放他們，有如當年的居魯士。當然，對於那些既得利益者，他們就並不熱衷默西亞的出現了，因為驅逐羅馬人對他們不會帶來任何好處。所以若翰的答案令他們鬆一口氣。但他們仍不放心繼續追問若翰是否厄里亞。那麼，厄里亞又是誰呢？
「厄里亞」是君王時代，抗衡拜偶像的腐敗君王的一個先知典型。他捍衛雅威的崇拜，曾獨力與450個拜偶像的假先知比拼誰所呼喚的神是真天主，結果當然是厄里亞勝出。他最為人所津津樂道的，莫過於他並沒有好像一般人一樣死去，而是天主派遣一輪由火馬拉的火車，在旋風中把他接到天上去。另一位先知瑪拉基亞曾預言在末日，在默西亞來臨前厄里亞會出現，為默西亞作好末世的準備，是默西亞的前驅。若翰又否認了。調查團更放心了，末日沒有這麼快出現。
「那位先知」(若1:21)是指梅瑟在【申命紀18章】所提及的一位像梅瑟一樣的先知。因為他像梅瑟一樣，所以這位先知亦可能會擔任拯救以色列的任務。他的出現對當時的權貴亦不會是一個好消息，一個福音。
既然若翰不是那些預言中的大人物，法利塞人就放心質問若翰憑甚麼權柄為人施洗。這樣就給若翰一個為基督作證的機會。你們知道嗎？若翰就是因為這個機會，感到滿心歡喜。因為他就是為了為耶穌作先驅，預備他的道路而來到這世上的。若翰說:「有新娘的是新郎；新郎的朋友侍立靜聽，一聽得新郎的聲音，就非常喜樂：我的喜樂已滿足了。」（若3:29）耶穌曾評論並讚美洗者若翰說：「在婦女所生者中，沒有興起一位比洗者若翰更大的」（瑪11:11）。
今天是「喜樂主日」。作為基督徒，我們有甚麼值得喜樂呢？保祿宗徒在讀經二告訴我們，天主的旨意是要我們「在基督耶穌內時常喜樂」（得前5:16-18）。在基督耶穌內時常喜樂是甚麼意思呢？請各位想一想，我們做天主教徒，信了耶穌之後是甚麼使我們喜樂呢？
原來喜樂的秘訣就記載在今天的讀經一之中。天主透過依撒意亞先知告訴我們：吾主上主的神臨到我身上，派遣我向貧苦的人傳佈喜信，治療破碎了的心靈…等等，我們就會有如新郎新娘一樣喜樂。先知說，我們每人都領受了聖神，獲得神恩。聖保祿宗徒說，神恩雖各有不同，都是為建樹基督的身體（弗4:12）注意，喜樂已不再在於物質生活上的富足，不在於攀登上社會的高位，有權有勢；而在於好像若翰洗者一樣，完成天主所委派給我們的任務，就是傳福音的任務。傳福音使其他人都能獲得天主的救恩，這就是做天主教徒喜樂的真正意義。
可是，天主教徒在人前好像並不喜樂。很多教友覺得在人前表露教徒的身份很尷尬。歸根究底都是我們並不熱衷傳福音。為甚麼我們並不熱衷傳福音呢？因為我們洗禮之後，沒有恆心讀經祈禱，尋求天主的旨意。我們對福音的內容陌生，怕自己說錯了。殊不知是天主聖神希望透過我們向未信的人說話。耶穌說：「聖神必要教給你們應說的話。」(路12:12) 我們覺得領聖事，參彌撒已經足夠了，最多參加善會，服務堂區，已算熱心了吧，傳福音就留給神父、執事、修士修女做吧。領聖事，參彌撒，服務堂區固然是重要，但這些祗是前菜而不是主菜。天主在我們面前擺設了豐富的盛宴（詠23:5），而我們卻揀飲擇食，祗挑選了一些前菜而不吃主菜。真可惜。我們既然領受了聖神，享受著天賜的神恩，為甚麼埋沒了這些神恩，不運用它們呢？在我們傳福音的時候，我們就像先知一樣，天主透過我們向不信的人說話，我們將會經驗到天主的德能在我們身上運行，這是何等的喜樂。這種喜樂，不應是神職人員的專利，我們每一個教友都有權分一杯羹。
依撒意亞先知是四大先知之首，他宣講了很多有關默西亞的預言。將臨期主日的十二篇讀經一，就有七篇出自依撒意亞。所以黎神父曾建議過我們在將臨期讀完依撒意亞先知書。雖然將臨期已過了一半，所謂「遲到好過無到」。現在開始研讀依撒意亞先知，體會他的精神，也未算遲。天主保佑。
3rd Sunday of Advent, Year B
Theme: Joy in evangelization is the joy of Christians
There is nothing new under the sun (Ecclesiastes 1:9). A 2000-year old story continues to play out today. The time of Jesus was a troubled time. Judaea was a Roman colony. Some played up to the powerful, willingly became their puppets, running dogs and even propaganda machines. Some chose to resist with violence and the rest became the silent majority. When the whole society was pressurized, a voice appeared in the wilderness calling “Repent ye for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.” (Matthew 3:2). Naturally, the power centre in Jerusalem sent a delegation to investigate. It consisted of priests, Levites and Pharisees. When they asked the Baptist who he was, the Baptist denied that he was the Messiah. So, what was the Messiah?
Messiah is a Hebrew word, meaning the Anointed One. In Old Testament time, important officials such as kings and priests would be anointed in a public ceremony to indicate to the Israelites that they were chosen by God. However, the title of “Messiah” was not exclusively Jewish. For example, Isaiah called Cyrus, the Persian King, the Anointed One of the Lord (Isaiah 45:1).
During the early stage of the United Empire when David had united the 12 tribes of Israel, the Ark of Covenant was still housed within curtains (2 Samuel 7:2). Therefore, David intended to build a Temple to adore the Ark. God saw the loyalty of David. Not only did God decline David’s generosity, but He also promised, through the prophet Nathan, that David’s dynasty would last forever. This was the famous “Nathan Oracle” which will be read next Sunday.
Later, David’s dynasty was overthrown. Jews were exiled to Babylon only to be liberated by King Cyrus the Anointed One. On reflection, the Jews reasoned that God’s promise would not fail. Therefore, though the Davidic dynasty might fall, God would raise a descendant of David to rebuild his kingdom. This would be the Messiah they were awaiting.
When the delegation interrogated the Baptist, most Jews were eagerly expecting the Messiah to come to drive away the Romans, to liberate them like what Cyrus did in the past. Of course, the parties of vested interests were not as eager because driving out the Romans brought them no benefits. So, they were relieved to hear John’s denial. But their relief was incomplete. They continued to ask the Baptist whether he was Elijah. So, what was Elijah?
Elijah was a typical prophet who fought against corrupt and idolatrous kings. He defended Yahweh-worship and single-handedly combated 450 Baal prophets to prove whose god was the true God. Of course Elijah won the day. He was most remembered for being taken up to heaven in a fiery chariot drawn by fiery horses in a whirlwind. Prophet Malachi prophesized that on the Lord’s Day, Elijah would appear to prepare the coming of the Messiah. Elijah was the forerunner of the Messiah. The Baptist denied a second time. The delegation was relieved because the end time had not yet arrived.
“The prophet” (John 1:21) was the prophet Moses mentioned in Deuteronomy 18. This prophet was as powerful as Moses and so was expected to take up a liberator role. His appearance would not be a good news to the people of authority either.
If the Baptist was not any prophesized important dignitary, the Pharisees would feel safe to challenge the Baptist’s authority to baptize. This gave the Baptist an opportunity to bear witness to Jesus. Because of this opportunity, the Baptist was full of joy because this was his raison d'être. John said, “He that hath the bride is the bridegroom: but the friend of the bridegroom, which standeth and heareth him, rejoiceth greatly because of the bridegroom’s voice: this my joy therefore is fulfilled.” (John 3:29) Jesus once commented and praised the Baptist, saying: “Among them that are born of women there hath not risen a greater than John the Baptist.” (Matthew 11:11)
Today is Gaudete Sunday. What makes us Catholics joyful? In the second reading today, St. Paul told us that it is God’s will for us to be always joyful in Christ Jesus (1Thessalonians 5:16-18). What does it mean to be always joyful in Christ Jesus? Let’s ponder, what makes us joyful after becoming a Catholic, after believing in Jesus?
The secret to be joyful is found in the first reading today. Through Isaiah, God told us that the Spirit of the Lord is upon me ... sending me out to bring good tidings to the afflicted and to bind up the brokenhearted etc. Then we would be as joyful as brides and bridegrooms (Isaiah 61:1, 10). Isaiah said each of us has received the Spirit, received spiritual gifts. St. Paul told us that though God’s grace may be different for each of us, the purpose is to build up the body of Christ (Ephesians 4:12). Pay attention. Joy is no long material satisfaction, or social status, power and influence. Instead, it is, like the Baptist, the accomplishment of the mission commissioned by God, viz. evangelization. Evangelization is to make others receive God’s salvation. This is the true meaning of Christian joy.
However, Catholics do not appear to be joyful in front of people. Many Catholics find it embarrassing to reveal their Christian identity. Why? It is all because we are not enthusiastic in evangelization. Why not? It is because we are not steadfast in prayer and bible study to discover God’s will after baptism. When we are not familiar with the contents of the gospel, we are afraid to make mistakes when we preach. We don’t know that it is the Holy Spirit who wishes to speak to non-believers through us. Jesus said, “The Holy Spirit will teach you in that very hour what you ought to say” (Luke 12:12). We feel that it is enough to receive sacraments, to join masses or we are fervent enough when we join some laity associations to serve the parish. Leave the preaching job to the clergy and nuns. Of course it is essential to receive sacraments, to join masses and serve the parish, but these are just side dishes, not the main course. The Lord prepares a table before me (Psalm 23:5), yet we are very choosy, picking up the side dishes rather than the main course. What a pity! Since we have received the Holy Spirit and are enjoying God’s graces, why should we bury the talents and do not make use of them? In preaching the gospel, we will be like prophets, allowing God to speak through us to non-believers. We will be able to experience the joy and excitement of God’s power working in us. This joy is not the privilege of the clergy. Each baptized Catholic can partake in this excitement.
Isaiah is the first of the four Major Prophets. He prophesizes a lot about the Messiah. Among the 12 first readings on Advent Sundays, 7 are taken from Isaiah. That was why Fr. Lejeune encouraged us to finish reading Isaiah in Advent. Though we are already halfway through Advent, it is better late than never. Start reading Isaiah to experience his spirit now. God bless.
Sunday, 14 December 2014
Sunday, 7 December 2014
Could John's baptism forgive sins?
During the Saturday Catechumen class, we were reading Mark 1:1-8. The class consists of catechumens who are undergoing instructions to prepare for baptism. There are also baptized Catholics who want to brush up their faith. Indeed, the Church has been talking about New Evangelization among the baptized. To a certain extent, the Hong Kong Diocese is running ahead of the other churches and is doing a good job in providing theological training not just for the clergy but also for the laity.
When we came to Mark 1:4, some Catholics showed signs of puzzlement. Isn't only Christian baptism the only baptism that is capable of forgiving sins? Why does the gospel say that John's baptism can forgive sins? The Christian baptism is a sacrament while John's baptism is not. If John's baptism is not a sacrament, it does not give grace and so it cannot forgive sins. This simplistic line of reasoning is understandable. Perhaps the instructors of these Catholics had not received adequate theological training or they were too eager to defend the superiority of Christian baptism over John's baptism so much so that they ignore the gospel! Of course the gospel cannot be wrong. That is to say John's baptism could indeed forgive sins. No theology can overwrite the bible. But then, how can we harmonize this gospel text with sacramental theology?
First of all, sacraments are the products of the Church. The disciples of John the Baptist failed to build up their church. They left behind no writings of their own. Their existence was only inferred from the Acts of the Apostles. Therefore, nowadays there is no such thing as the baptism of John the Baptist to challenge the supremacy of Christian baptism, i.e. their ability to forgive sins.
Secondly, since the gospel cannot be wrong, we should ask how the Baptist's baptism could forgive sins. All the Synoptic gospels report that Jesus was baptized by the Baptist. It seems a bit embarrassing for Christians because we can imagine how the disciples of John the Baptist would tease their Christian counterparts --- "Your Master Jesus was also baptized by our Master John. So, Jesus was also a disciple of John the Baptist like one of us. Therefore, call us Masters!" We can further imagine how Christian retorted by saying that Christian baptism gives the Holy Spirit and John's did not. This is a correct argument. The supremacy of Christian baptism over John's baptism lies at its ability to give the Holy Spirit.
Thirdly, it was a popular HKCEE RS question to ask why the sinless Jesus should receive baptism from John. One of the model answers was that Jesus showed his approval of the work of John the Baptist. This answer is redundant because the gospel already says that John was the forerunner sent by God to prepare the hearts of the Jews to receive the Messiah. Without God's commission, the Baptist could not baptize on his own. Prompted by this answer, I would rather suggest that Jesus came to sanctify John's baptism to make it capable of forgiving sins.
Traditional catechists usually say, in their piety, that Jesus came down to the water to sanctify the water so that it might wash away our sins when we receive Christian baptism. But this explanation cannot establish the monopoly of Christian baptism. If this explanation is accepted, any baptism with water should be able to forgive sins because water all over the world is the same. Otherwise, only water in River Jordan can forgive sins. No baptism held outside River Jordan would be valid! This is an unnecessary burden, very much like the circumcision required of Gentile believers.
There is always room for improvement for us catechists. Let's work hard to keep up.
Dear Lord, inflame the hearts of your servants to know you better. Amen.
When we came to Mark 1:4, some Catholics showed signs of puzzlement. Isn't only Christian baptism the only baptism that is capable of forgiving sins? Why does the gospel say that John's baptism can forgive sins? The Christian baptism is a sacrament while John's baptism is not. If John's baptism is not a sacrament, it does not give grace and so it cannot forgive sins. This simplistic line of reasoning is understandable. Perhaps the instructors of these Catholics had not received adequate theological training or they were too eager to defend the superiority of Christian baptism over John's baptism so much so that they ignore the gospel! Of course the gospel cannot be wrong. That is to say John's baptism could indeed forgive sins. No theology can overwrite the bible. But then, how can we harmonize this gospel text with sacramental theology?
First of all, sacraments are the products of the Church. The disciples of John the Baptist failed to build up their church. They left behind no writings of their own. Their existence was only inferred from the Acts of the Apostles. Therefore, nowadays there is no such thing as the baptism of John the Baptist to challenge the supremacy of Christian baptism, i.e. their ability to forgive sins.
Secondly, since the gospel cannot be wrong, we should ask how the Baptist's baptism could forgive sins. All the Synoptic gospels report that Jesus was baptized by the Baptist. It seems a bit embarrassing for Christians because we can imagine how the disciples of John the Baptist would tease their Christian counterparts --- "Your Master Jesus was also baptized by our Master John. So, Jesus was also a disciple of John the Baptist like one of us. Therefore, call us Masters!" We can further imagine how Christian retorted by saying that Christian baptism gives the Holy Spirit and John's did not. This is a correct argument. The supremacy of Christian baptism over John's baptism lies at its ability to give the Holy Spirit.
Thirdly, it was a popular HKCEE RS question to ask why the sinless Jesus should receive baptism from John. One of the model answers was that Jesus showed his approval of the work of John the Baptist. This answer is redundant because the gospel already says that John was the forerunner sent by God to prepare the hearts of the Jews to receive the Messiah. Without God's commission, the Baptist could not baptize on his own. Prompted by this answer, I would rather suggest that Jesus came to sanctify John's baptism to make it capable of forgiving sins.
Traditional catechists usually say, in their piety, that Jesus came down to the water to sanctify the water so that it might wash away our sins when we receive Christian baptism. But this explanation cannot establish the monopoly of Christian baptism. If this explanation is accepted, any baptism with water should be able to forgive sins because water all over the world is the same. Otherwise, only water in River Jordan can forgive sins. No baptism held outside River Jordan would be valid! This is an unnecessary burden, very much like the circumcision required of Gentile believers.
There is always room for improvement for us catechists. Let's work hard to keep up.
Dear Lord, inflame the hearts of your servants to know you better. Amen.
Sunday, 30 November 2014
A PR disaster --- WATCH with a rusty mentality
My boss and his Crisis Management Committee were deeply troubled by a message left in the forum of “SaluteToHKPolice”. The message was supposed to be a screen capture of a Facebook page of one of our alumni. The message was a collection of obscenity and curses against the Hong Kong Police for their recent “excessive brutality” towards the OC protestors. This message has caused more than 2000 feedbacks that criticized the supposed Facebook author. The one who posted this message also included a “background” of this Facebook author: the name of our school, the physical and email addresses, telephone and fax numbers etc.
My boss felt guilty for the obscenity of the language used. How could our students write such obscenity and curses on the Internet? We are a Catholic school and we have failed the public! The school actually received some 7 complaint emails and at least 2 phone calls. At the advice of the CMC, my boss issued a statement which was put up briefly for about four hours on the school webpage, withdrawn after a second thought. Some alumni were unhappy with the stance of the statement and they were collecting money to put up an advertisement on a newspaper to voice their discontent against their alma mater ... It was a PR disaster! This time, we needed to ad hoc a PR adviser, not an educational psychologist as we have usually done.
Jesus told us to WATCH (Mark 13:37). However, we teachers have very little IT expertise and our mentality is rusty. We used to being always right. We knew all.
“We provide students with quality education to prepare them to become citizens with independent thinking and full social awareness in order to play a positive role in the ever-changing world.”
(a partial quotation from the School Mission, ) Sigh!
Even if we want to watch, we are not sensitive enough to appreciate the repercussion of issuing our political stance on the Internet at this turmoil moment. We look but see not, hear but understand not (Mark 4:12). We are not able to understand the reactions of our alumni. We feel lost. My boss is even prepared to quit in order to save the reputation of the school! Once again, rusty mentality.
My Dear Lord, in this season of Advent, open our eyes and our hearts to WATCH with humility. Amen.
My boss felt guilty for the obscenity of the language used. How could our students write such obscenity and curses on the Internet? We are a Catholic school and we have failed the public! The school actually received some 7 complaint emails and at least 2 phone calls. At the advice of the CMC, my boss issued a statement which was put up briefly for about four hours on the school webpage, withdrawn after a second thought. Some alumni were unhappy with the stance of the statement and they were collecting money to put up an advertisement on a newspaper to voice their discontent against their alma mater ... It was a PR disaster! This time, we needed to ad hoc a PR adviser, not an educational psychologist as we have usually done.
Jesus told us to WATCH (Mark 13:37). However, we teachers have very little IT expertise and our mentality is rusty. We used to being always right. We knew all.
“We provide students with quality education to prepare them to become citizens with independent thinking and full social awareness in order to play a positive role in the ever-changing world.”
(a partial quotation from the School Mission, ) Sigh!
Even if we want to watch, we are not sensitive enough to appreciate the repercussion of issuing our political stance on the Internet at this turmoil moment. We look but see not, hear but understand not (Mark 4:12). We are not able to understand the reactions of our alumni. We feel lost. My boss is even prepared to quit in order to save the reputation of the school! Once again, rusty mentality.
My Dear Lord, in this season of Advent, open our eyes and our hearts to WATCH with humility. Amen.
Sunday, 23 November 2014
I have been consumed by narcissism
We should be serving Christ in the needy, in the least of his brethren (Matthew 25:40). Yet, I have forgotten Erminia who is sharing my bed with me. God be my witness, had it been another woman in bed with me, I would not have been able to respond God’s call to permanent diaconate today. From the very first day we dated, I immediately could recognize that she is a gift God sent to help me along my path to sainthood. I was torn between the call to priesthood and marriage. Of course, my upbringing made me not suitable to serve God and his people as a priest. However, I secretly pledged to God. “Allow me to love and I will be able to love you better in the future.” God is patient and kind. He gives me room to mature.
But after getting my first computer, I indulged too much in cracking computer programs and literally made Erminia a “computer widow”. She told me point-blank tonight, “Your DM has saved you.” Truly, my DM helps me reconcile with my mother who would not forgive me for deserting her, getting married and moved to Tuen Mun. My DM made Erminia tolerate my narcissism. But my narcissism does not do me good. I withdrew more and more into my comfort zone, developed depression and licked my wounds sustained after departing from La Salle.
Meanwhile, Erminia had to take care of the children, both as a mother and a father. Though she has complained that I have not spent enough quality time with the children, I did not take appropriate actions. Though not very successful, she had to dress up as much as she could, the wounds the boys sustained while being brought up by the grandmothers. Up till today, she feels very guilty about it, in particular, for Hilary our first born who seems to be the most hard-hit, feeling deserted by us. He has developed a withdrawn and evading character, not confident enough to face challenges and frustrations squarely. Of course I share a lion share of the blame but it is Erminia who bears all the guilt alone.
When I am sick, she takes care of me. But when she is sick, I am not even aware of her health state! I have been consumed by narcissism and am slow in picking up her distress signals. Our communication breaks down. In conclusion, I see that I love myself more than anything else. Though I have responded to the call of permanent diaconate, I wonder if I am really honouring my pledge to God more than three decades ago. God, have mercy on me. I am a sinner.
Dear Lord, Erminia is patient and kind. She still hopes that I can return one day. Yes, I do. I hope it is not too late. My God, I owe her so much. I have not taken up a fair enough share of her burden. Forgive me. Help my children. Amen.
But after getting my first computer, I indulged too much in cracking computer programs and literally made Erminia a “computer widow”. She told me point-blank tonight, “Your DM has saved you.” Truly, my DM helps me reconcile with my mother who would not forgive me for deserting her, getting married and moved to Tuen Mun. My DM made Erminia tolerate my narcissism. But my narcissism does not do me good. I withdrew more and more into my comfort zone, developed depression and licked my wounds sustained after departing from La Salle.
Meanwhile, Erminia had to take care of the children, both as a mother and a father. Though she has complained that I have not spent enough quality time with the children, I did not take appropriate actions. Though not very successful, she had to dress up as much as she could, the wounds the boys sustained while being brought up by the grandmothers. Up till today, she feels very guilty about it, in particular, for Hilary our first born who seems to be the most hard-hit, feeling deserted by us. He has developed a withdrawn and evading character, not confident enough to face challenges and frustrations squarely. Of course I share a lion share of the blame but it is Erminia who bears all the guilt alone.
When I am sick, she takes care of me. But when she is sick, I am not even aware of her health state! I have been consumed by narcissism and am slow in picking up her distress signals. Our communication breaks down. In conclusion, I see that I love myself more than anything else. Though I have responded to the call of permanent diaconate, I wonder if I am really honouring my pledge to God more than three decades ago. God, have mercy on me. I am a sinner.
Dear Lord, Erminia is patient and kind. She still hopes that I can return one day. Yes, I do. I hope it is not too late. My God, I owe her so much. I have not taken up a fair enough share of her burden. Forgive me. Help my children. Amen.
Sunday, 16 November 2014
Love explains all
I am not sure whether perseverance is a talent or a virtue. My doggedness is amazing. When I want to get something done, I will spend hours and even days to find ways to get what I want. That was how I developed DM while cracking software protection. Meanwhile, in the exploration of different ways, I would discover pieces of newfound land. This is my style of learning, learning by doing even to this day.
I was trained a science student in the secondary school. Language was not my turf. Some five years into my teaching career, I came upon Computer Literacy. I found writing computer programs and learning different computer languages fascinating. My reward? Some short-lived cracked computer programs and diabetes.
As for my responding to the diaconate vocation, I regret that I have not answered earlier. I am privileged to be called to serve. I understand that I have to overcome my arrogance which is the very obstacle to receiving God’s grace of serving as a deacon. In my younger days, when I wanted to do something, nothing could prevent me from doing it. Today, I will not be so arrogant. I would say, I would like to do this, if God wishes.
I know I am pragmatic and physical. I may not be a spiritual man because I use my intellect more than affection. From what I know about myself, I will put in more efforts in spiritual formation, to pray with the Scripture more. I am sure God wishes this into me.
My wife and I attended a Workshop for Deacons’ wives. It was a very fruitful workshop for all of us, including all the gentlemen who could afford to join. The speaker was a Spanish speaking lady, Montserrat Martínez, a very experienced and capable scholar and a deacon wife for more than three decades. Since she felt more comfortable in delivering her talks in her native tongue, the VG invited Fr. Gabriel Altamirano O. MG, to be an instantaneous interpreter. Fr. Gabriel did not translate mechanically. He sprinkled his translations with wit and personality by which I mean he was able to add a bit of his own comments and dissent in his translations. He kept on saying “she said that ...” In fact, Fr. Gabriel was once a member of the Diocesan Commission For the Permanent Diaconate. He was indeed the most appropriate candidate to do this job.
On Sunday, he delivered an enlightening homily on the Parable of Talents in Matthew. His delivery was effortless and his perspective sharp. He made use of “love” to explain the difference between the servant given 5 talents and the one with only one talent. With love, the servants, who were given 5 and 2 talents, worked eagerly and earned double. Without love, the servant with 1 talent was afraid (Matthew 25:25) and out of fear buried his talent! Bravo! How wonderful to see that everything falls in place.
Dear Lord, help me love you more. Amen.
I was trained a science student in the secondary school. Language was not my turf. Some five years into my teaching career, I came upon Computer Literacy. I found writing computer programs and learning different computer languages fascinating. My reward? Some short-lived cracked computer programs and diabetes.
As for my responding to the diaconate vocation, I regret that I have not answered earlier. I am privileged to be called to serve. I understand that I have to overcome my arrogance which is the very obstacle to receiving God’s grace of serving as a deacon. In my younger days, when I wanted to do something, nothing could prevent me from doing it. Today, I will not be so arrogant. I would say, I would like to do this, if God wishes.
I know I am pragmatic and physical. I may not be a spiritual man because I use my intellect more than affection. From what I know about myself, I will put in more efforts in spiritual formation, to pray with the Scripture more. I am sure God wishes this into me.
My wife and I attended a Workshop for Deacons’ wives. It was a very fruitful workshop for all of us, including all the gentlemen who could afford to join. The speaker was a Spanish speaking lady, Montserrat Martínez, a very experienced and capable scholar and a deacon wife for more than three decades. Since she felt more comfortable in delivering her talks in her native tongue, the VG invited Fr. Gabriel Altamirano O. MG, to be an instantaneous interpreter. Fr. Gabriel did not translate mechanically. He sprinkled his translations with wit and personality by which I mean he was able to add a bit of his own comments and dissent in his translations. He kept on saying “she said that ...” In fact, Fr. Gabriel was once a member of the Diocesan Commission For the Permanent Diaconate. He was indeed the most appropriate candidate to do this job.
On Sunday, he delivered an enlightening homily on the Parable of Talents in Matthew. His delivery was effortless and his perspective sharp. He made use of “love” to explain the difference between the servant given 5 talents and the one with only one talent. With love, the servants, who were given 5 and 2 talents, worked eagerly and earned double. Without love, the servant with 1 talent was afraid (Matthew 25:25) and out of fear buried his talent! Bravo! How wonderful to see that everything falls in place.
Dear Lord, help me love you more. Amen.
Sunday, 9 November 2014
我們都是聖殿 All of us are temples
祝聖拉脫朗大殿
主題：我們都是聖殿
梅瑟蒙召解放以色列人脫離埃及的奴役，過了紅海，到西乃山與天主訂立盟約。他按天主的吩咐造了一個約櫃，安放著天主所頒佈的十誡。天主就用這種形式與他們在曠野同行了40年。
進入客納罕福地定居下來，建立了以色列國之後，在公元前957年，撒羅滿王在耶路撒冷建成第一座聖殿，把約櫃與梅瑟在曠野高舉過的銅蛇，供奉在內。雖然天主藉依撒意亞先知曾表示過天是天主的寶座，地是天主的腳凳，天主不需要住在人手建造的聖殿（依66：1）。但聖殿是有存在價值的。一方面它表示天主的臨在；另一方面，它又是聚集萬民，祈禱崇拜天主的好地方。但好境不常，以色列沒有遵守誡命，結果召來亡國之痛。在公元前721年，北國以色列率先亡國予亞述。在公元前586年，南國猶大繼而亡國，座落耶路撒冷有370年歷史的聖殿被毀，約櫃與銅蛇，從此下落不明。大部份猶大國人，充軍巴比倫。
厄則克耳是舊約的「四大先知」之一。他在猶大國亡國前十年，與所有貴族及壯丁，已先被擄往巴比倫做人質。在那裡天主召叫他做先知，給他神視之恩，並傳達天主的說話去鼓勵安慰後來一齊充軍的同胞，告訴他們天主仍與他們同行。厄則克耳在猶大國亡國之前是一個司祭，所以對聖殿有一份不能磨滅的感情。亦因如此，先知書記載的最後一個神視，亦是有關新聖殿的神視。今天的第一篇讀經就是該神視的一部份。公元前538年，波斯帝國滅巴比倫，波斯王居魯士恩准猶大國人回國，他的兒子達理亞更資助他們重建聖殿。厄則克耳的神視應驗了一部份。至於從聖殿流出的水有滋養生命，治療疾病的神視，就有待耶穌基督來應驗了。
在今天所讀的福音中的聖殿就是公元前515年落成的第二座聖殿，它亦經歷希臘帝國和羅馬帝國的摧殘，到公元前20年，大黑落德為了討好猶太人，開始維修並擴建這第二座聖殿，到耶穌清理聖殿的時候，已擴建了46年了。這聖殿，在公元70年，羅馬帝國鎮壓猶太人叛亂時一把火燒了，結束了它的585年歷史。當年耶穌不滿聖殿的司祭，貪污腐敗，把聖殿變成為詐騙斂財的地方，而不是萬民祈禱敬拜天主的地方。於是耶穌義憤填膺，驅逐商人，清理聖殿。結果招至殺身之禍，完成贖世的工程。在福音中，耶穌清楚表示自己就是那座「不經人手所興建的真正聖殿。」更好說，聖殿只不過是一個記號，象徵在基督內天人聚合，天人合一。
其實耶穌更加是湧到永生的活水。在耶穌受難的時候，有士兵為了保証耶穌真是在十字架上死了，就用長矛刺透耶穌的肋膀。立刻就有血和水從刺穿了的肋膀湧出。我們相信，這血和水不單表示耶穌為了拯救人類所作的完全交付，並且，這是天主的意思，藉聖洗聖事治好我們的罪過，並以耶穌的聖血，滋養我們的靈魂。
耶穌升天及聖神降臨後，門徒數目雖然大增，但仍未成氣候。他們在教友的家中團聚擘餅，是「家庭教會」，亦即是今天所說的「基基團」。當遇到本地官員的欺凌或羅馬帝國的逼害時，他們的組織不能是公開的地上教會，而是冒生命危險在地下墓穴舉行主的晚餐的，名副其實的「地下教會」。有意見認為在禮儀中獻香，除了象徵祈禱上達於天主台前之外，還有辟臭辟蟲的實際作用。終於，守得雲開見月明，羅馬帝國的逼害結束了，教會進入一個昇平的時代了。
今天我們所慶祝的「祝聖拉脫朗大殿節」的拉脫朗大殿，是羅馬四大教堂之首，被稱為「一眾聖堂之母」。約在公元313年，君士旦丁大帝把它贈送給羅馬的主教，於公元324年祝聖，後來更成了教宗的座堂，已有1690年歷史。是君士旦丁令基督徒可以享有「信仰自由」，是他開創先河，令以後的王帝、貴族，慷慨地捐贈大量物業和土地給教會。也是這個原故，紀念「主的晚餐」由一個簡單的擘餅晚餐，慢慢進化成充滿宮廷禮節的彌撒。其實聖堂最重要的，不單是建築上的氣魄或者是令人肅然起敬的祈禱氣氛，而是在聖堂裡祈禱的人。
聖伯多祿和聖保祿兩位宗徒都不約而同教訓說：「我們是建造耶穌基督這座屬神殿宇的活石（伯前2:5），是聖神的宮殿（格前3：16）。」既然我們是聖殿，就讓我們默想我們有甚麽可以流出，滋養治療別人的生命。
首先，我們沒有讀過醫科，又不會行神蹟，又怎樣醫治別人呢？沒有讀過醫科，對。我們真的不會行神蹟，錯！事實上，醫治的力量來自耶穌基督，我們只不過是負責輸送天主恩寵的渠道。我們蒙召成聖，不是憑自己的法力行神蹟，而是把天主的恩寵傳送給別人，同時亦享受在傳送過程中所通過我們的恩寵。聖母是滿被聖寵者，不是因為她修行多年，累積了很多聖寵，很大的法力，而是她接受天主的召叫，把恩寵之源，耶穌基督輸送到這世界上。是她告訴耶穌婚宴上沒有酒了，是她站在十字架下接受了教會之母的任務，是她在耶穌升天後陪著耶穌復活後所聚集到的120個門徒，在她陪伴下，聖神降臨，開始了「教會的時代」。天主是不會偏心的，祂不會給聖母很多恩寵，給我們小小恩寵，我們與聖母的分別在於我們的輸送管是否暢通，有沒有閉塞。
我們暢通嗎？我們自己有沒有勤領聖事，與主結合呢？我有沒有祈禱讀經，體會耶穌的心意，好能把祂的恩寵輸送給別人呢？
我們閉塞嗎？常見的一種閉塞是驕傲。上星期的福音所講的山羊與綿羊的比喻，可以理解為鼓勵大家多行愛德，服事弱小者身上的耶穌基督。但大家有沒有反轉來想一想，調轉身份，成為饑渴者、病弱者，自己成為耶穌的化身，謙遜地接受他人的服事，造就他人成為輸送天主恩寵的渠道呢？這樣做，我們豈不做到了「在病弱中成聖自己、在接受服事中聖化他人」嗎？就讓我們繼續努力，成聖自己，聖化他人，轉化世界。
天主保祐。
Feast of the Dedication of St. John Lateran Basilica
Theme: All of us are temples
God called Moses to liberate the Israelites from Egyptian slavery. They crossed the Red Sea and reached Mount Sinai to seal the Old Covenant with God. Moses followed God’s instructions to build an Ark of Covenant and put the Ten Commandments in it. In this manner, God accompanied the Israelites in the wilderness for 40 years.
After settling in Canaan to build up the Kingdom of Israel, King Solomon finished building the first Temple in Jerusalem in 957 B.C. In this Temple, he put the Ark of Covenant and the Bronze Serpent which Moses had once raised in the wilderness for adoration. Though God spoke through Isaiah that heaven is his throne and the earth is his footstool, that he does not need to rest in a Temple built by man (Isaiah 66:1), the Temple still has its intrinsic values. On the one hand, the Temple signifies the presence of God among men. On the other, it is a good place to gather all peoples to pray and worship God. Unfortunately, the fidelity of Israelites was short-lived. They did not observe the commandments and ended up being conquered. In 721 B.C., the northern kingdom Israel was annihilated by the Assyrians. In 586 B.C., the southern kingdom Judah had fallen into the hand of the Babylonians. The 370-year-old First Temple of Jerusalem was burnt down. The Ark of Covenant and the Bronze Serpent were nowhere to be found. Most of the people of Judah were exiled to Babylon.
Ezekiel was one of the Four Major Prophets of the Old Testament. Ten years before the fall of Judah, he was captured as hostages together with the aristocrats and strong young men to Babylon. There, God called him to be a prophet and gave him the gift of vision to pass on God’s words of consolation to those exiles who joined him later, telling them that God exiled with them. Before Judah was conquered, Ezekiel was a priest. He had an inerasable emotional bond with the Temple. That was why the last vision recorded in the book was a vision related to the new Temple. The first reading we heard today is part of that vision. In 538 B.C., Persia conquered Babylon. Cyrus the Persian king allowed the exiles of Judah to return home. His son Darius even subsidized their rebuilding of the Temple. The vision of Ezekiel was partly fulfilled. That part of the life-giving water flowing out from the Temple had to wait for its fulfillment in Jesus.
The Temple we read in the gospel today was the Second Temple built in 515 B.C. It also went through sacrileges and vandalism during the Greek and Roman empires. In 20 B.C., in order to please the Jews, Herod the Great renovated and extended this Second Temple. When Jesus cleansed it, the building project had gone through 46 years. This Temple too was burnt down in 70 A.D. by the Roman army when it suppressed the first Jewish Revolt, thus ending its history of 585 years. What infuriated Jesus was the mismanagement of the priests whose corruption had turned the Temple from a house of prayer for the peoples into a house of cheats. Consequently, Jesus was killed to fulfill his salvation project. In the incident, Jesus made it clear that he himself is the true Temple which is not built by human hands. To put it better, the Temple was only a sign symbolizing the communion of God and men in Jesus.
In fact, Jesus is the living water running towards eternal life. During his Passion, a soldier, in order to ensure the death of Jesus, pierced his side with a spear. Immediately, blood and water gushed out from his wound. We believe that this water and blood not only show how Jesus totally surrendered himself in the redemption of mankind, but it is also a means with which God intends to heal us through baptism and to nourish our souls through the Eucharist.
After Jesus’ ascension and the descent of the Holy Spirit, the number of disciples multiplied but the Christian community was still insignificant. They broke bread in the houses of the disciples. They formed ‘house churches’, or ‘basic Christian Communities’ in modern jargon. When the local officials bullied them, or when the Empire systematically persecuted them, they could not officially be recognized as churches. Christians had to risk their lives to celebrate the Lord’s Supper in the catacomb. They were truly ‘underground churches’. Some experts opine that the incense offered in liturgy not only symbolizes our prayers reaching up to heaven, but also served practical purposes as deodorant and insect repellent. At last, Roman persecution ended. The Church has entered a peaceful era.
The Lateran Basilica whose dedication we celebrate today ranks the oldest and the first of the four major basilicas in Rome. It has been honoured the mother and head of all the churches in the city and the world “omnium urbis et orbis ecclesiarum mater et caput”. Around 313 A.D., Constantine gave it to the bishop of Rome. It was consecrated in 324 A.D. and later made the cathedral of the Roman Pontiff. It is already sixteen hundred and ninety years old. It was Constantine who gave religious freedom to Christians. It was him who set a precedent for subsequent kings and nobles of donating mansions and land to the Church. And it is because of this practice that the simple bread-breaking Lord’s Supper has evolved into a mass that is full of regal pomp and ceremony. In fact, the most important element in a church building is not its awe commanding architecture or its solemn prayerful atmosphere. It is the people who pray in it.
Both Ss. Peter and Paul teach that we are living stones which build up the spiritual house (1 Peter 2:5) and God’s temples (1 Corinthians 3:6). Since we are God’s temples, let us meditate what flows out from us that nourishes and heals.
Firstly, we have not studied medicines, nor can we work miracles, how do we heal? Haven’t studied medicines? You’re probably right. Unable to work miracles? Wrong! Indeed, healing powers come from Jesus Christ. We are only channels responsible for the transmission of God’s grace. We are called to be holy, not to work miracles with our magical powers, but to channel God’s grace to others and in doing so, enjoy the grace that goes through us. Our Lady is “full of grace”, not because she has practised contemplation for ages, thus accumulating a lot of graces and powers. Rather, it is because she humbly accepted God’s call to bring forth the source of all graces, Jesus Christ into this world. It was she who told Jesus that people had drunk up all the wine in the wedding banquet. It was she who stood under the cross to be given the mission to be the Mother of the Church. It was she who accompanied the 120 disciples Jesus gathered before his ascension. With Our Lady around, the Holy Spirit descended and inaugurated the Age of the Church. God will not favour Our Lady by giving her many graces and giving us little. The difference between the BVM and us is whether our channel is obstructed or not.
Is our channel unobstructed? Are we in communion with the Lord through receiving the sacraments frequently? Do we know the will of the Lord through prayers and bible studies? Can we channel His grace to the others unobstructed?
Is our channel obstructed? One of the most popular obstructions is pride. The message of the gospel reading last week (Matthew 25:31-46) can be interpreted as an encouragement for us to do more charities, to serve Jesus Christ in the needy. But have you ever thought about it upside down, about a switch of roles to become the hungry, the thirst and the sick, to become an incarnated Christ to humbly accept the service of the others, making them a channel of God’s grace? In so doing, haven’t we “sanctify ourselves in our sickness, sanctify others in being served”? Let us work hard to sanctify ourselves, sanctify others and transform the world.
God bless.
主題：我們都是聖殿
梅瑟蒙召解放以色列人脫離埃及的奴役，過了紅海，到西乃山與天主訂立盟約。他按天主的吩咐造了一個約櫃，安放著天主所頒佈的十誡。天主就用這種形式與他們在曠野同行了40年。
進入客納罕福地定居下來，建立了以色列國之後，在公元前957年，撒羅滿王在耶路撒冷建成第一座聖殿，把約櫃與梅瑟在曠野高舉過的銅蛇，供奉在內。雖然天主藉依撒意亞先知曾表示過天是天主的寶座，地是天主的腳凳，天主不需要住在人手建造的聖殿（依66：1）。但聖殿是有存在價值的。一方面它表示天主的臨在；另一方面，它又是聚集萬民，祈禱崇拜天主的好地方。但好境不常，以色列沒有遵守誡命，結果召來亡國之痛。在公元前721年，北國以色列率先亡國予亞述。在公元前586年，南國猶大繼而亡國，座落耶路撒冷有370年歷史的聖殿被毀，約櫃與銅蛇，從此下落不明。大部份猶大國人，充軍巴比倫。
厄則克耳是舊約的「四大先知」之一。他在猶大國亡國前十年，與所有貴族及壯丁，已先被擄往巴比倫做人質。在那裡天主召叫他做先知，給他神視之恩，並傳達天主的說話去鼓勵安慰後來一齊充軍的同胞，告訴他們天主仍與他們同行。厄則克耳在猶大國亡國之前是一個司祭，所以對聖殿有一份不能磨滅的感情。亦因如此，先知書記載的最後一個神視，亦是有關新聖殿的神視。今天的第一篇讀經就是該神視的一部份。公元前538年，波斯帝國滅巴比倫，波斯王居魯士恩准猶大國人回國，他的兒子達理亞更資助他們重建聖殿。厄則克耳的神視應驗了一部份。至於從聖殿流出的水有滋養生命，治療疾病的神視，就有待耶穌基督來應驗了。
在今天所讀的福音中的聖殿就是公元前515年落成的第二座聖殿，它亦經歷希臘帝國和羅馬帝國的摧殘，到公元前20年，大黑落德為了討好猶太人，開始維修並擴建這第二座聖殿，到耶穌清理聖殿的時候，已擴建了46年了。這聖殿，在公元70年，羅馬帝國鎮壓猶太人叛亂時一把火燒了，結束了它的585年歷史。當年耶穌不滿聖殿的司祭，貪污腐敗，把聖殿變成為詐騙斂財的地方，而不是萬民祈禱敬拜天主的地方。於是耶穌義憤填膺，驅逐商人，清理聖殿。結果招至殺身之禍，完成贖世的工程。在福音中，耶穌清楚表示自己就是那座「不經人手所興建的真正聖殿。」更好說，聖殿只不過是一個記號，象徵在基督內天人聚合，天人合一。
其實耶穌更加是湧到永生的活水。在耶穌受難的時候，有士兵為了保証耶穌真是在十字架上死了，就用長矛刺透耶穌的肋膀。立刻就有血和水從刺穿了的肋膀湧出。我們相信，這血和水不單表示耶穌為了拯救人類所作的完全交付，並且，這是天主的意思，藉聖洗聖事治好我們的罪過，並以耶穌的聖血，滋養我們的靈魂。
耶穌升天及聖神降臨後，門徒數目雖然大增，但仍未成氣候。他們在教友的家中團聚擘餅，是「家庭教會」，亦即是今天所說的「基基團」。當遇到本地官員的欺凌或羅馬帝國的逼害時，他們的組織不能是公開的地上教會，而是冒生命危險在地下墓穴舉行主的晚餐的，名副其實的「地下教會」。有意見認為在禮儀中獻香，除了象徵祈禱上達於天主台前之外，還有辟臭辟蟲的實際作用。終於，守得雲開見月明，羅馬帝國的逼害結束了，教會進入一個昇平的時代了。
今天我們所慶祝的「祝聖拉脫朗大殿節」的拉脫朗大殿，是羅馬四大教堂之首，被稱為「一眾聖堂之母」。約在公元313年，君士旦丁大帝把它贈送給羅馬的主教，於公元324年祝聖，後來更成了教宗的座堂，已有1690年歷史。是君士旦丁令基督徒可以享有「信仰自由」，是他開創先河，令以後的王帝、貴族，慷慨地捐贈大量物業和土地給教會。也是這個原故，紀念「主的晚餐」由一個簡單的擘餅晚餐，慢慢進化成充滿宮廷禮節的彌撒。其實聖堂最重要的，不單是建築上的氣魄或者是令人肅然起敬的祈禱氣氛，而是在聖堂裡祈禱的人。
聖伯多祿和聖保祿兩位宗徒都不約而同教訓說：「我們是建造耶穌基督這座屬神殿宇的活石（伯前2:5），是聖神的宮殿（格前3：16）。」既然我們是聖殿，就讓我們默想我們有甚麽可以流出，滋養治療別人的生命。
首先，我們沒有讀過醫科，又不會行神蹟，又怎樣醫治別人呢？沒有讀過醫科，對。我們真的不會行神蹟，錯！事實上，醫治的力量來自耶穌基督，我們只不過是負責輸送天主恩寵的渠道。我們蒙召成聖，不是憑自己的法力行神蹟，而是把天主的恩寵傳送給別人，同時亦享受在傳送過程中所通過我們的恩寵。聖母是滿被聖寵者，不是因為她修行多年，累積了很多聖寵，很大的法力，而是她接受天主的召叫，把恩寵之源，耶穌基督輸送到這世界上。是她告訴耶穌婚宴上沒有酒了，是她站在十字架下接受了教會之母的任務，是她在耶穌升天後陪著耶穌復活後所聚集到的120個門徒，在她陪伴下，聖神降臨，開始了「教會的時代」。天主是不會偏心的，祂不會給聖母很多恩寵，給我們小小恩寵，我們與聖母的分別在於我們的輸送管是否暢通，有沒有閉塞。
我們暢通嗎？我們自己有沒有勤領聖事，與主結合呢？我有沒有祈禱讀經，體會耶穌的心意，好能把祂的恩寵輸送給別人呢？
我們閉塞嗎？常見的一種閉塞是驕傲。上星期的福音所講的山羊與綿羊的比喻，可以理解為鼓勵大家多行愛德，服事弱小者身上的耶穌基督。但大家有沒有反轉來想一想，調轉身份，成為饑渴者、病弱者，自己成為耶穌的化身，謙遜地接受他人的服事，造就他人成為輸送天主恩寵的渠道呢？這樣做，我們豈不做到了「在病弱中成聖自己、在接受服事中聖化他人」嗎？就讓我們繼續努力，成聖自己，聖化他人，轉化世界。
天主保祐。
Feast of the Dedication of St. John Lateran Basilica
Theme: All of us are temples
God called Moses to liberate the Israelites from Egyptian slavery. They crossed the Red Sea and reached Mount Sinai to seal the Old Covenant with God. Moses followed God’s instructions to build an Ark of Covenant and put the Ten Commandments in it. In this manner, God accompanied the Israelites in the wilderness for 40 years.
After settling in Canaan to build up the Kingdom of Israel, King Solomon finished building the first Temple in Jerusalem in 957 B.C. In this Temple, he put the Ark of Covenant and the Bronze Serpent which Moses had once raised in the wilderness for adoration. Though God spoke through Isaiah that heaven is his throne and the earth is his footstool, that he does not need to rest in a Temple built by man (Isaiah 66:1), the Temple still has its intrinsic values. On the one hand, the Temple signifies the presence of God among men. On the other, it is a good place to gather all peoples to pray and worship God. Unfortunately, the fidelity of Israelites was short-lived. They did not observe the commandments and ended up being conquered. In 721 B.C., the northern kingdom Israel was annihilated by the Assyrians. In 586 B.C., the southern kingdom Judah had fallen into the hand of the Babylonians. The 370-year-old First Temple of Jerusalem was burnt down. The Ark of Covenant and the Bronze Serpent were nowhere to be found. Most of the people of Judah were exiled to Babylon.
Ezekiel was one of the Four Major Prophets of the Old Testament. Ten years before the fall of Judah, he was captured as hostages together with the aristocrats and strong young men to Babylon. There, God called him to be a prophet and gave him the gift of vision to pass on God’s words of consolation to those exiles who joined him later, telling them that God exiled with them. Before Judah was conquered, Ezekiel was a priest. He had an inerasable emotional bond with the Temple. That was why the last vision recorded in the book was a vision related to the new Temple. The first reading we heard today is part of that vision. In 538 B.C., Persia conquered Babylon. Cyrus the Persian king allowed the exiles of Judah to return home. His son Darius even subsidized their rebuilding of the Temple. The vision of Ezekiel was partly fulfilled. That part of the life-giving water flowing out from the Temple had to wait for its fulfillment in Jesus.
The Temple we read in the gospel today was the Second Temple built in 515 B.C. It also went through sacrileges and vandalism during the Greek and Roman empires. In 20 B.C., in order to please the Jews, Herod the Great renovated and extended this Second Temple. When Jesus cleansed it, the building project had gone through 46 years. This Temple too was burnt down in 70 A.D. by the Roman army when it suppressed the first Jewish Revolt, thus ending its history of 585 years. What infuriated Jesus was the mismanagement of the priests whose corruption had turned the Temple from a house of prayer for the peoples into a house of cheats. Consequently, Jesus was killed to fulfill his salvation project. In the incident, Jesus made it clear that he himself is the true Temple which is not built by human hands. To put it better, the Temple was only a sign symbolizing the communion of God and men in Jesus.
In fact, Jesus is the living water running towards eternal life. During his Passion, a soldier, in order to ensure the death of Jesus, pierced his side with a spear. Immediately, blood and water gushed out from his wound. We believe that this water and blood not only show how Jesus totally surrendered himself in the redemption of mankind, but it is also a means with which God intends to heal us through baptism and to nourish our souls through the Eucharist.
After Jesus’ ascension and the descent of the Holy Spirit, the number of disciples multiplied but the Christian community was still insignificant. They broke bread in the houses of the disciples. They formed ‘house churches’, or ‘basic Christian Communities’ in modern jargon. When the local officials bullied them, or when the Empire systematically persecuted them, they could not officially be recognized as churches. Christians had to risk their lives to celebrate the Lord’s Supper in the catacomb. They were truly ‘underground churches’. Some experts opine that the incense offered in liturgy not only symbolizes our prayers reaching up to heaven, but also served practical purposes as deodorant and insect repellent. At last, Roman persecution ended. The Church has entered a peaceful era.
The Lateran Basilica whose dedication we celebrate today ranks the oldest and the first of the four major basilicas in Rome. It has been honoured the mother and head of all the churches in the city and the world “omnium urbis et orbis ecclesiarum mater et caput”. Around 313 A.D., Constantine gave it to the bishop of Rome. It was consecrated in 324 A.D. and later made the cathedral of the Roman Pontiff. It is already sixteen hundred and ninety years old. It was Constantine who gave religious freedom to Christians. It was him who set a precedent for subsequent kings and nobles of donating mansions and land to the Church. And it is because of this practice that the simple bread-breaking Lord’s Supper has evolved into a mass that is full of regal pomp and ceremony. In fact, the most important element in a church building is not its awe commanding architecture or its solemn prayerful atmosphere. It is the people who pray in it.
Both Ss. Peter and Paul teach that we are living stones which build up the spiritual house (1 Peter 2:5) and God’s temples (1 Corinthians 3:6). Since we are God’s temples, let us meditate what flows out from us that nourishes and heals.
Firstly, we have not studied medicines, nor can we work miracles, how do we heal? Haven’t studied medicines? You’re probably right. Unable to work miracles? Wrong! Indeed, healing powers come from Jesus Christ. We are only channels responsible for the transmission of God’s grace. We are called to be holy, not to work miracles with our magical powers, but to channel God’s grace to others and in doing so, enjoy the grace that goes through us. Our Lady is “full of grace”, not because she has practised contemplation for ages, thus accumulating a lot of graces and powers. Rather, it is because she humbly accepted God’s call to bring forth the source of all graces, Jesus Christ into this world. It was she who told Jesus that people had drunk up all the wine in the wedding banquet. It was she who stood under the cross to be given the mission to be the Mother of the Church. It was she who accompanied the 120 disciples Jesus gathered before his ascension. With Our Lady around, the Holy Spirit descended and inaugurated the Age of the Church. God will not favour Our Lady by giving her many graces and giving us little. The difference between the BVM and us is whether our channel is obstructed or not.
Is our channel unobstructed? Are we in communion with the Lord through receiving the sacraments frequently? Do we know the will of the Lord through prayers and bible studies? Can we channel His grace to the others unobstructed?
Is our channel obstructed? One of the most popular obstructions is pride. The message of the gospel reading last week (Matthew 25:31-46) can be interpreted as an encouragement for us to do more charities, to serve Jesus Christ in the needy. But have you ever thought about it upside down, about a switch of roles to become the hungry, the thirst and the sick, to become an incarnated Christ to humbly accept the service of the others, making them a channel of God’s grace? In so doing, haven’t we “sanctify ourselves in our sickness, sanctify others in being served”? Let us work hard to sanctify ourselves, sanctify others and transform the world.
God bless.
Sunday, 2 November 2014
OC and three out of Six Corporal Works of Mercy
Today, we celebrated the Feast of All Souls and launch the remembrance of the faithfully departed for the whole month. Traditionally, we Catholics pray for the souls in the Purgatory. They can no longer help themselves because they have shed their physical bodies. However, we on earth can perform many different types of Works of Mercy to help them. In fact, when the Church encourages us to perform these works, we are actually helping ourselves as well.
The idea of Corporal Works of Mercy comes from the gospel reading today, Matthew 25:31-46. This is the famous scene of the Last Judgment if you care to believe in it. As I use to saying, Jesus told us beforehand the syllabus of the Final examination: feed the hungry, quench the thirsty, shelter the homeless, clad the naked, nurse the sick and visit the imprisoned (vv 35-36). During the Last Judgment, Jesus will not ask whether you were baptized, you have skipped masses or saying graces. But of course, this does not give you a licence to oversleep and miss a Sunday mass. This syllabus is designed for all humanity, peoples of all faiths or no faith. This is the minimum requirement to enter eternal life. We Catholics count ourselves privileged to be baptized and to enjoy the foretaste of heaven on earth before it ends.
Does the story give me any inspiration in seeing the present OC stalemate?
It all started with the fact that the Occupiers have been fed up with the injustice a government that favours the tycoons with the approval from the Central government. Many SME shops have been folded up because of high rents. Many young people cannot buy a flat to start their own families. All the citizens have to foot the bill of overspent MTR projects to join the Mainland and many scandals are played out among government officials etc. They are hungered and thirsted of democracy. They want a government that is also accountable to them and not just to the rich and the Central government. Who can feed them and quench their thirst?
The students are like helpless souls in the Purgatory. They find themselves entered a cul-de-sac but are unable to find a way out. The adults outside insist that the decisions have been final. It is out of the question for NPC to amend their August 31 Announcement. Our students remain "imprisoned" as long as they uphold their ideals and demands which the adults dismiss as unrealistic and impracticable. They are free to go whenever they give up. But do we want to see them give up?
Quite a number of people do. For example, many anti-Occupation groups which have emerged from nowhere to take advantage of the situation to demonstrate their loyalty to the Central Government as can be heard from their mouthpieces in Hong Kong; those who claim that their livelihood have been hurt (e.g. taxi drivers, truck drivers, shop-owners, hotel managers and tour agencies etc.) and of course the HKSAR Government whose image has been more tarnished the longer she takes to resolve the impasse. However, many anti-Occupation tactics, such as tear gas, smear campaigns such as unsubstantiated allegations of foreign interventions, provisional court injunctions, withdrawal of sponsorship to universities, provocations and scuffles with Occupiers etc. seem to have backfired and fanned the momentum of the Occupation more. Do both governments want to end the Movement by dissipating the energies of our students? Do both governments see that by extending a helping hand to these helpless students, they are helping themselves in the long run instead? I always feel sorry for the Central government for her failure to attract competent people to do their jobs. Judge for yourselves the characters and qualities of those anti-Occupiers.
On the other hand, the students are practising some of the Beatitudes taught in the gospel. The generation gap in mentality is truly nowhere more obvious than in this Umbrella Movement. Unfortunately, so far nobody is able to offer a satisfactory compromise to bridge the gap. We don't know how long the students are going to hold out and I worry whether this course of political education would produce a huge group of disillusioned radical activists in Hong Kong in the future.
Dear Heavenly Father, what is your plan? Not our will, but Your will be done. Grant Your unworthy servant the joy to see a righteous ending. Amen.
The idea of Corporal Works of Mercy comes from the gospel reading today, Matthew 25:31-46. This is the famous scene of the Last Judgment if you care to believe in it. As I use to saying, Jesus told us beforehand the syllabus of the Final examination: feed the hungry, quench the thirsty, shelter the homeless, clad the naked, nurse the sick and visit the imprisoned (vv 35-36). During the Last Judgment, Jesus will not ask whether you were baptized, you have skipped masses or saying graces. But of course, this does not give you a licence to oversleep and miss a Sunday mass. This syllabus is designed for all humanity, peoples of all faiths or no faith. This is the minimum requirement to enter eternal life. We Catholics count ourselves privileged to be baptized and to enjoy the foretaste of heaven on earth before it ends.
Does the story give me any inspiration in seeing the present OC stalemate?
It all started with the fact that the Occupiers have been fed up with the injustice a government that favours the tycoons with the approval from the Central government. Many SME shops have been folded up because of high rents. Many young people cannot buy a flat to start their own families. All the citizens have to foot the bill of overspent MTR projects to join the Mainland and many scandals are played out among government officials etc. They are hungered and thirsted of democracy. They want a government that is also accountable to them and not just to the rich and the Central government. Who can feed them and quench their thirst?
The students are like helpless souls in the Purgatory. They find themselves entered a cul-de-sac but are unable to find a way out. The adults outside insist that the decisions have been final. It is out of the question for NPC to amend their August 31 Announcement. Our students remain "imprisoned" as long as they uphold their ideals and demands which the adults dismiss as unrealistic and impracticable. They are free to go whenever they give up. But do we want to see them give up?
Quite a number of people do. For example, many anti-Occupation groups which have emerged from nowhere to take advantage of the situation to demonstrate their loyalty to the Central Government as can be heard from their mouthpieces in Hong Kong; those who claim that their livelihood have been hurt (e.g. taxi drivers, truck drivers, shop-owners, hotel managers and tour agencies etc.) and of course the HKSAR Government whose image has been more tarnished the longer she takes to resolve the impasse. However, many anti-Occupation tactics, such as tear gas, smear campaigns such as unsubstantiated allegations of foreign interventions, provisional court injunctions, withdrawal of sponsorship to universities, provocations and scuffles with Occupiers etc. seem to have backfired and fanned the momentum of the Occupation more. Do both governments want to end the Movement by dissipating the energies of our students? Do both governments see that by extending a helping hand to these helpless students, they are helping themselves in the long run instead? I always feel sorry for the Central government for her failure to attract competent people to do their jobs. Judge for yourselves the characters and qualities of those anti-Occupiers.
On the other hand, the students are practising some of the Beatitudes taught in the gospel. The generation gap in mentality is truly nowhere more obvious than in this Umbrella Movement. Unfortunately, so far nobody is able to offer a satisfactory compromise to bridge the gap. We don't know how long the students are going to hold out and I worry whether this course of political education would produce a huge group of disillusioned radical activists in Hong Kong in the future.
Dear Heavenly Father, what is your plan? Not our will, but Your will be done. Grant Your unworthy servant the joy to see a righteous ending. Amen.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)